Free Novel Read

Solovyov and Larionov Page 2


  kitchen, he was working on something that went beyond

  simply training himself in pronunciation: he was, as he characterized it, eliminating the provincialism within himself.

  Solovyov’s thesis advisor, the eminent Professor Nikolsky, played an important role in Solovyov’s development. After

  reading his student’s first important paper, which was

  devoted to Russia’s conquest of the Far East, the professor invited Solovyov to his office, where he said nothing for a long time, blowing on the paper tube of a Belomorkanal cigarette all the while (he had taken a liking to those cigarettes while working at the forced labor site bearing the

  same name).

  ‘My friend,’ said the professor after lighting the cigarette,

  ‘scholarship is dull. If you don’t get used to that notion, it will not be easy for you to pursue it.’

  The professor requested that Solovyov delete from his

  paper the words great, triumphant, and only possible. He also asked his student if he was familiar with the theory according to which Russians squandered the energy granted to them

  by conquering expanses of inhuman dimensions. His student

  was not. Prior to acquainting Solovyov with this theory,

  Prof. Nikolsky requested that he delete the phrase phenomenon indicating progress, too. The author of the paper was 580VV_txt.indd 9

  22/08/2018 15:38

  10

  E U G E N E V O D O L A Z K I N

  asked to pay special attention to the formatting of bibliographical and persuasive footnotes. A careful look at this aspect of the paper revealed that the only properly formatted footnote was ‘Ibid., 12.’

  To be utterly candid, the majority of what Prof. Nikolsky

  said seemed like nitpicking to Solovyov, yet it was this very discussion that formed the basis of a friendship between

  professor and student. The professor was at that age when

  his quibbles could no longer be offensive to the young man and Solovyov’s own history, which was anything but simple, did its part in forcing his advisor to show more leniency

  toward his student.

  Prof. Nikolsky never tired of repeating to his mentee that, as a rule, pretty phrases in scholarship are misguided, and the beauty of those phrases is based on their alleged universality and an absence of exceptions. But—and here the

  cigarette in the professor’s hand would trace a smoky

  ellipsis—that absence is spurious. No exhaustive truths exist (hardly any exist, the professor corrected himself, bringing the statement into accord with his own theory). For each a there is always a b and a c to be found, as well as something that no letters can convey. An honest researcher takes all that into account, but his pronouncements cease being beautiful. Thus spoke Prof. Nikolsky.

  At some point, Solovyov’s blue-eyed romanticism gave

  way to a pronounced inclination toward precision, so this

  was a time when he discovered a particular beauty: the

  beauty of reliable knowledge. This was a time when the

  young man’s papers started to be mottled with enormous

  quantities of exhaustive and meticulously formatted foot-

  notes. Footnotes became for him more than an occasion to

  580VV_txt.indd 10

  22/08/2018 15:38

  S O L O V Y O V A N D L A R I O N O V

  11

  express respect for his predecessors. They revealed to him that there was no one realm of knowledge where he,

  Solovyov, would be first, and that scholarship is, to the

  highest degree, a process that is bequeathed. They were

  representatives of great, all-encompassing knowledge. They watched after Solovyov and educated him, forcing him to

  rid himself of approximate and uncertain assertions. They

  blew open his smooth school-based exposition, because a

  text, just like existence itself, cannot exist without conditions.

  Solovyov inserted footnote after footnote, marveling that

  he had managed to get by without them at the beginning

  of his scholarly career. When footnotes began accompa-

  nying nearly every word he wrote, Prof. Nikolsky was forced to stop him. He announced to Solovyov, in passing, that

  scholars usually get by without footnotes at the end of their careers, too. The young researcher felt disheartened.

  Despite Solovyov’s expectations, the Pacific Ocean—to

  which he fought his way in his first important paper—did

  not become his primary topic. Prof. Nikolsky was able to

  convince his student that the most important part of history takes place on a continent. Only a strong familiarity with that part of history gives a researcher the right to leave dry land from time to time. After a wrenching internal struggle, Solovyov decided to postpone setting sail.

  Solovyov came to appreciate Petersburg fully during his

  five university years. He began wearing high-quality but

  unostentatious clothing (clothing becomes more colorful

  when advancing south, and not only in Russia), referenced

  the powers that be with the short word they, and took a liking to evening strolls on Vasilevsky Island. His habit of taking strolls continued later, after renting an apartment on 580VV_txt.indd 11

  22/08/2018 15:38

  12

  E U G E N E V O D O L A Z K I N

  the Petrograd Side (Zhdanovskaya Embankment, No. 11).

  He would walk home after finishing his work at the library.

  Sadovaya Street. Summer Garden. Troitsky Bridge. In the

  winter, when the Summer Garden was closed (in accordance

  with its name) and its statues were boarded up in boxes,

  Solovyov would choose another route. He would reach the

  Neva River via Griboedov Canal and then turn on to

  Dvortsovy Bridge, after walking past the Winter Palace

  (which was open year-round, unlike the Summer Garden).

  At home, he would place his soaked boots on the radiator.

  By morning they would turn white, from the salt scattered

  by the yard workers.

  Solovyov came to love the Public Library’s special winter

  coziness: Catherine the Great’s figure in a half-frosted window, pre-war lamps on the tables, and the barely audible whispering of those sitting behind him. He liked the indescribable library scent. That scent united the aromas of books, oak shelves, and worn runner rugs. All libraries smell that way. The

  snow-covered, one-story village library where the young

  Solovyov had borrowed books smelled that way. It was an

  hour and a half’s walk from the Kilometer 715 station; Solovyov stopped by the library after school before heading back to his station. He would sit, half-facing the elderly librarian Nadezhda Nikiforovna’s desk, while she searched for his books somewhere behind the cabinets. As he awaited Nadezhda

  Nikiforovna’s return, Solovyov would examine his violet

  fingers, which he sank into his rabbit-fur hat. Her voice would emerge from behind the cabinets from time to time.

  ‘ Captain Blood: His Odyssey?’

  ‘Already read it.’

  He read everything. The village library became his first

  580VV_txt.indd 12

  22/08/2018 15:38

  S O L O V Y O V A N D L A R I O N O V

  13

  true revelation and Nadezhda Nikiforovna was his first love.

  Unlike the houses by the railroad, the library was very quiet and did not smell of railroad ties. Mixed in with the fabulous library potion was the smell of Red Moscow perfume. This was Nadezhda Nikiforovna’s perfume. If there was anything

  Solovyov felt was missing later, in his Petersburg life, it was likely Red Moscow.

  ‘ In Search of the Castaways?’

  Her quiet voice made goosebumps sl
owly descend down

  Solovyov’s spine. After licking a fingertip, Nadezhda

  Nikiforovna would pull his library card out of the drawer

  and enter the necessary notation. Fascinated, Solovyov

  followed the movement of her large fingers, with their dulled nails. A cameo glistened on her ring finger. When she placed a book on a shelf, Nadezhda Nikiforovna’s ring grazed the

  wood and the cameo produced a muffled plastic sound. That

  sound took on an extraordinary elegance, almost an elite

  quality, in Solovyov’s ears because it was so unlike the clanging of train carriage couplers. Later, he would qualify it as world culture’s first bashful knock at the door of his soul.

  More often than not, Solovyov did not come to the library

  alone: he was with a girl named Leeza, who lived in the

  house next door. Leeza was not allowed to walk home by

  herself and was ordered to wait for Solovyov at the library.

  She would sit some distance away, silently observing the

  book exchange process. Sometimes she would borrow some-

  thing Solovyov had already read. Solovyov immediately

  forgot about Leeza after coming home. He would recollect

  all the details of his visit to the library, indulging himself in dreams of married life with Nadezhda Nikiforovna.

  It should be emphasized that he was eight years old then

  580VV_txt.indd 13

  22/08/2018 15:38

  14

  E U G E N E V O D O L A Z K I N

  and his dreams were fully virtuous. Remote as he was from

  civilization’s hotbeds (and based on Nadezhda Nikiforovna’s expression, from those hotbeds’ settled ashes, too), Solovyov vaguely imagined the tasks of marriage, as well as the ways it takes its course. As it happened, that village library was his sole link to the outside world, ruling out the availability not only of erotic publications but of suggestive illustrations in periodicals as well. Nadezhda Nikiforovna censored new

  acquisitions in her free time, ruthlessly cutting those items out.

  There is nothing surprising in the fact that five years later, when their instincts were awakening, Solovyov and Leeza

  were deprived of all manner of guidance in that sphere and progressed by groping along, in the literal sense of the word.

  Nevertheless, when the adolescent Solovyov engaged in sex

  in later years, he did not consider himself unfaithful to

  Nadezhda Nikiforovna. The idea of marriage, which had

  so warmed his heart as a child, lost no attraction for him then, either. The change took place only upon recognizing

  that certain things should not be demanded of Nadezhda

  Nikiforovna.

  Leeza’s surname—Larionova—does not lack interest in

  this present narrative. This present narrative is inclined to accentuate various resemblances and coincidences because

  there is meaning in any similarity: similarity opens up

  another dimension and alludes to a true perspective, without which one’s view would certainly hit a wall. In taking on

  research into General Larionov’s life and work, Solovyov

  bore in mind his own previous familiarity with that same

  surname. He placed significance on such things. Needless

  to say, the young researcher could not yet explain the role 580VV_txt.indd 14

  22/08/2018 15:38

  S O L O V Y O V A N D L A R I O N O V

  15

  of the Larionovs in his life, though even then he felt the role would not be secondary.

  As happens more often than not with events that are

  intended to occur, Solovyov’s research topic came to him

  by chance. Another graduate student, Kalyuzhny, had

  worked on the topic before Solovyov. Yes, this pleasant fellow lacked all manner of scholarly energy and, really, most likely any energy whatsoever. His efforts were sufficient for him to make his way to some academic beer joint and settle in

  there for the entire remainder of the day. Kalyuzhny

  regarded the general sympathetically and experienced an

  undeniable curiosity regarding his fate. The primary thing he did not understand was that (and here Kalyuzhny’s index finger slid along a glass) the general had remained alive.

  Over the course of several years, Kalyuzhny retold Dupont’s classic research to everyone who sat down at his table. This long retelling obviously wore him out in a real way because he did not write a single line during those years of unending narration. Gathering his last strength, graduate student

  Kalyuzhny unexpectedly did what the general had not

  brought himself to do in his day: he left the country.

  Kalyuzhny’s further fate is unknown.

  Solovyov’s fate is known, however, and, according to the

  unanimous opinion of his colleagues, it was up to him to

  replace his drop-out associate. Only a few months after

  entering graduate school, Solovyov delivered a paper at a

  conference: ‘Studying the Life and Activity of General

  Larionov: Conclusions and Outlooks.’

  The conclusions that Solovyov drew and the outlooks he

  summarized made a most favorable impression on the schol-

  arly public. The paper testified not only to the young

  580VV_txt.indd 15

  22/08/2018 15:38

  16

  E U G E N E V O D O L A Z K I N

  researcher’s well-organized mind but also, in equal measure, to his deep insight into the topic. The climax of the paper, which evoked extraordinary animation in the hall, was his

  introduction of corrections to data in Dupont’s monograph

  that had been considered unshakable until that day.

  And so, it turned out that there were only 469 soldiers

  on record in the 34th Infantry Division of the 136th

  Taganrog Regiment, not the 483 soldiers Dupont asserted.

  It also emerged that the French researcher had, on the other hand, reduced the number of soldiers in the 2nd Native

  Division of the Combined Cavalier Brigade to 720 (the true number was 778). Dupont did not shed full light on the

  role of Colonel Yakov Noga (1878–?) in the Crimean

  campaign; however, the officer’s level of education had

  clearly been overstated: the French researcher mistakenly

  indicated that Noga graduated from the Vladimir and Kiev

  cadet corps, though he graduated only from the Vladimir

  (named for Saint Vladimir) Kiev Cadet Corps. Solovyov set

  forth a series of more minor quibbles with the French

  monograph, but in this case one must think it permissible

  to limit discussion to the examples cited above. Even they are enough to characterize the quality of the young scholar’s work and his unwillingness to blindly trust his

  predecessors’ authority.

  This was Solovyov’s finest hour. Dupont hid behind a

  marble column in the conference hall as she listened to

  Solovyov’s paper. According to the accounts of those who

  saw her at that moment, the French historian’s eyes were

  brimming with tears. A person less dedicated to scholarship might have been offended by all the corrections that

  Solovyov introduced. That person might have become

  580VV_txt.indd 16

  22/08/2018 15:38

  S O L O V Y O V A N D L A R I O N O V

  17

  embittered or, who knows, shrugged their shoulders and

  snorted with disdain. Or said, let us suppose, that the specified clarifications held an extremely relative value in

  explaining the Crimean events of 1920. But Dupont was

  not that sort of person. At Solovyov’s ‘Thank you for your attention,’ she
ran out from behind the column and

  embraced the presenter. Was that ardent scholarly embrace—

  which combined sobbing and smudged mascara and a

  prickly mustache—not a triumph of sincere values and

  evidence of the sanctity of the great international solidarity of researchers?

  Standing behind the lectern, her faced streaked with

  mascara, Dupont recalled everyone who had devoted them-

  selves to researching the post-revolutionary period at various times. She referred, with particular emotion, to Ieronim A.

  Ratsimor, who had conceived of, but not managed to

  complete, the monumental Encyclopedia of the Civil War.

  ‘He died on the letter K,’ Dupont said of the deceased,

  ‘but if he could have held on for just one more letter, our level of knowledge about General Larionov would have

  been different, completely different. But now we see,’ and with these words the researcher once again drew Solovyov

  to herself, ‘our worthy successor. Now we can feel calm

  about leaving.’

  The polite Solovyov initially wanted to object to what

  Dupont had said, to ask that henceforth she continue

  engaging in the work that was so important to everyone,

  but she would not allow it. With a sweep of her huge hand, she seemed to conjure out of thin air her monograph about

  the general, which she then forcefully pressed to Solovyov’s chest. After kissing him again in parting, she marched across 580VV_txt.indd 17

  22/08/2018 15:38

  18

  E U G E N E V O D O L A Z K I N

  the conference hall and vanished into the duskiness of a

  corridor.

  She called him from Paris. Positively everything about

  the young researcher interested her: his views on history

  overall, his biases in terms of methodology, and even—this was completely unexpected—his material standing. Unlike

  all the other areas, Solovyov found no intelligible answer to her question about the matter. Dupont herself deduced the

  reality of the Russian scholar’s material standing: it was simply lacking.

  Stunned by that circumstance, Dupont delved into the

  reasons for such a somber state of affairs. Standing firm on determinist positions, the representative of French historical scholarship lined up a long cause-and-effect chain. There is no point in citing it in full: the events Dupont referred to are well known to any Russian schoolchild, though perhaps